Submission in Response to the Australian Productivity Commission's Inquiry into IP Arrangements Draft Report

Alexander, I; Bond, C; Bowrey, K; Burrell, R; Handler, M; Greenleaf, G; Nicol, D; Nielsen, JL; Weatherall, KG

Submission in Response to the Australian Productivity Commission's Inquiry into IP Arrangements Draft Report

Alexander, I

Bond, C Bowrey, K Burrell, R Handler, M Greenleaf, G Nicol, D Nielsen, JL Weatherall, KG

Permalink

Publisher:: University of New South Wales Law Research Series
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: UNSW Law Research Paper, 2016, (2016-51), pp. 1 - 39
Issue Date:: 2016-06-03

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published VersionAdobe PDF (759.56 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Alexander, I https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-3572	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Bond, C	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Bowrey, K	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Burrell, R	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Handler, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Greenleaf, G	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Nicol, D	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Nielsen, JL	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Weatherall, KG	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-06-03	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	UNSW Law Research Paper, 2016, (2016-51), pp. 1 - 39	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/116713
dc.description.abstract	This Submission by nine intellectual property academics responds to the Draft Report in the Inquiry into IP Arrangements published by the Australian Productivity Commission on 29 April 2016 ('Draft Report'). In broad terms, the submission supports many of the goals of, and recommendations of, the Productivity Commission expressed in the Draft Report, but expresses concerns that some recommendations may not achieve the overall goals of the Commission, or reflect misunderstandings of the statutory framework. The submission addresses many of the Commission's draft recommendations concerning copyright, patents, trade marks and geographical indicators, IP and public institutions, and IP's institutional and governance arrangements.	en_US
dc.publisher	University of New South Wales Law Research Series	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	UNSW Law Research Paper	en_US
dc.title	Submission in Response to the Australian Productivity Commission's Inquiry into IP Arrangements Draft Report	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2016-51	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.issue	2016-51	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published online	en_US

Abstract:

This Submission by nine intellectual property academics responds to the Draft Report in the Inquiry into IP Arrangements published by the Australian Productivity Commission on 29 April 2016 ('Draft Report'). In broad terms, the submission supports many of the goals of, and recommendations of, the Productivity Commission expressed in the Draft Report, but expresses concerns that some recommendations may not achieve the overall goals of the Commission, or reflect misunderstandings of the statutory framework. The submission addresses many of the Commission's draft recommendations concerning copyright, patents, trade marks and geographical indicators, IP and public institutions, and IP's institutional and governance arrangements.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/116713