A meta-analysis of judgment achievement as defined by the lens model equation

Kaufmann, E; Athanasou, JA

A meta-analysis of judgment achievement as defined by the lens model equation

Kaufmann, E Athanasou, JA

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Swiss Journal of Psychology, 2009, 68 (2), pp. 99 - 112
Issue Date:: 2009-06-12

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2008007815OK.pdf		1.72 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Kaufmann, E	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Athanasou, JA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-4098	en_US
dc.date.issued	2009-06-12	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Swiss Journal of Psychology, 2009, 68 (2), pp. 99 - 112	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1421-0185	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12597
dc.description.abstract	This research determined the extent of judgment achievement (i.e., accuracy) across different decision-making domains (e.g., medicine, business, education, psychology). Judgment achievement was examined in terms of the lens model equation (Tucker, 1964). A meta-analysis of 29 studies incorporating 1,032 people across 43 judgment tasks was performed. Overall judgment achievement across different tasks was found to be moderate (r = .42), ranging from .22 for studies in the area of psychology to .58 for those in other professional areas. Methodological moderator factors (type of correlation, database) used in task analysis or the number of cues used in tasks were also considered. The findings indicated that research on judgment achievement should examine judgment tasks relating to specific research areas. © 2009 by Verlag Hans Huber.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Swiss Journal of Psychology	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1024/1421-0185.68.2.99	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Social Psychology	en_US
dc.title	A meta-analysis of judgment achievement as defined by the lens model equation	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	68	en_US
utslib.for	1701 Psychology	en_US
utslib.for	1702 Cognitive Sciences	en_US
dc.location.activity	ISI:000267021600004	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/School of Education
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	2	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	68	en_US

Abstract:

This research determined the extent of judgment achievement (i.e., accuracy) across different decision-making domains (e.g., medicine, business, education, psychology). Judgment achievement was examined in terms of the lens model equation (Tucker, 1964). A meta-analysis of 29 studies incorporating 1,032 people across 43 judgment tasks was performed. Overall judgment achievement across different tasks was found to be moderate (r = .42), ranging from .22 for studies in the area of psychology to .58 for those in other professional areas. Methodological moderator factors (type of correlation, database) used in task analysis or the number of cues used in tasks were also considered. The findings indicated that research on judgment achievement should examine judgment tasks relating to specific research areas. © 2009 by Verlag Hans Huber.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12597