Indigenous Property Matters in Real Property Courses at Australian Universities

Graham, NG

Indigenous Property Matters in Real Property Courses at Australian Universities

Graham, NG

Permalink

Publisher:: Australasian Law Teachers Association
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Legal Education Review, 2009, 19 (2), pp. 289 - 304
Issue Date:: 2009-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (2.11 MB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Graham, NG https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4428-8830	en_US
dc.date.issued	2009-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Legal Education Review, 2009, 19 (2), pp. 289 - 304	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1033-2839	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12599
dc.description.abstract	Indigenous land laws, Indigenous perspectives on Anglo Australian property law and native title are often taught as optional or even irrelevant to real property in Australian law schools. Conventional pedagogical choices in many property law courses maintain this perspective through a restrictive curriculum schedule; through the limited provision of information about these matters in course readings; by neglecting the significance of language to property law generally and specifically to the historical development of property in Australian within the context of colonisation. In so doing, many property law courses diminish the radicalism and opportunity that Indigenous land laws offer the Anglo-Australian system of rights-based property which abstracts ownership from responsibility to land and water resources. This article suggests a pedagogical approach that is more inclusive of Indigenous laws and Indigenous perspectives on the Anglo-Australian law of real property.	en_US
dc.publisher	Australasian Law Teachers Association	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Legal Education Review	en_US
dc.title	Indigenous Property Matters in Real Property Courses at Australian Universities	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	19	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
utslib.for	1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.issue	2	en_US
pubs.volume	19	en_US

Abstract:

Indigenous land laws, Indigenous perspectives on Anglo Australian property law and native title are often taught as optional or even irrelevant to real property in Australian law schools. Conventional pedagogical choices in many property law courses maintain this perspective through a restrictive curriculum schedule; through the limited provision of information about these matters in course readings; by neglecting the significance of language to property law generally and specifically to the historical development of property in Australian within the context of colonisation. In so doing, many property law courses diminish the radicalism and opportunity that Indigenous land laws offer the Anglo-Australian system of rights-based property which abstracts ownership from responsibility to land and water resources. This article suggests a pedagogical approach that is more inclusive of Indigenous laws and Indigenous perspectives on the Anglo-Australian law of real property.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12599