Mental health and the media: a comparative case study in open justice
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Journal of Media Law, 2017, 9 (2), pp. 232 - 258
- Issue Date:
- 2017-07-03
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mental health and the media a comparative case study in open justice.pdf | Published Version | 1.93 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Media reportage about forensic mental health cases raises several competing rights and interests, including the public interest in open justice; a patient’s right to privacy, treatment and recovery; the public’s right to know about mental health tribunal processes; and victims’ and citizens’ interests in learning the longer term consequences of a publicised serious unlawful act. This article details a case study of successful applications for permission to identify a forensic mental health patient in both a radio documentary and in research blogs and scholarly works in Australia. It compares the authors’ experience in this case with three other cases in Australia and the UK, and identifies and weighs the competing policy issues and principles courts or tribunals consider when attempting to balance open justice with the rights and interests of a range of stakeholders in forensic mental health cases where the news media and/or patients are seeking publicity and/or identification.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: