Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12-item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women
Mayrink, J
Souza, RT
Silveira, C
Guida, JP
Costa, ML
Parpinelli, MA
Pacagnella, RC
Ferreira, EC
Sousa, MH
Say, L
Chou, D
Filippi, V
Barreix, M
Barbour, K
von Dadelszen, P
Cecatti, JG
Andreucci, CB
Angelini, CR
Ferraz, JP
Zanardi, DM
Camargo, RS
Cottler, S
Fawole, O
Firoz, T
Gadama, L
Ghérissi, A
Gyte, G
Hindin, M
Jayathilaka, A
Kalamar, A
Kone, Y
Lange, I
Magee, LA
Mathur, A
McCaw-Binns, A
Morgan, M
Munjanja, S
Gichuhi, GN
Petzold, M
Sullivan, E
Taulo, F
Tunçalp, Ö
Vanderkruik, R
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 141 pp. 48 - 54
- Issue Date:
- 2018-05-01
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12-item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women.pdf | Submitted Version | 724.87 kB | Adobe PDF |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mayrink, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Souza, RT | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Silveira, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Guida, JP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Costa, ML | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Parpinelli, MA | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pacagnella, RC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ferreira, EC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sousa, MH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Say, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chou, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Filippi, V | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Barreix, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Barbour, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | von Dadelszen, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cecatti, JG | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Andreucci, CB | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Angelini, CR | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ferraz, JP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zanardi, DM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Camargo, RS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cottler, S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fawole, O | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Firoz, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gadama, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ghérissi, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gyte, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hindin, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jayathilaka, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kalamar, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kone, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lange, I | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Magee, LA | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mathur, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | McCaw-Binns, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Morgan, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Munjanja, S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gichuhi, GN | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Petzold, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Sullivan, E |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Taulo, F | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tunçalp, Ö | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vanderkruik, R | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2018-05-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 141 pp. 48 - 54 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-7292 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/134154 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Objectives: To compare scores on the 36-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 tool (WHODAS-36) for postpartum women across a continuum of morbidity and to validate the 12-item version (WHODAS-12). Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Brazilian retrospective cohort study on long-term repercussions of severe maternal morbidity. We determined mean, median, and percentile values for WHODAS-36 total score and for each domain, and percentile values for WHODAS-12 total score in postpartum women divided into three groups: “no,” “nonsevere,” and “severe” morbidities. Results: The WHODAS-36 mean total scores were 11.58, 18.31, and 19.19, respectively for no, nonsevere, and severe morbidity. There was a dose-dependent effect on scores for each domain of WHODAS-36 according to the presence and severity of morbidity. The diagnostic validity of WHODAS-12 was determined by comparing it with WHODAS-36 as a “gold standard.” The best cut-off point for diagnosing dysfunctionality was the 95th percentile. Conclusion: The upward trend of WHODAS-36 total mean value scores of women with no morbidity compared with those with morbidity along a severity continuum may reflect the impact of morbidity on postpartum functioning. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics | en_US |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1002/ijgo.12466 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject.classification | Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Disability Evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Morbidity | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Retrospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility of Results | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Postpartum Period | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reference Values | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | World Health Organization | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Brazil | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Young Adult | en_US |
dc.title | Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12-item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 141 | en_US |
utslib.for | 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine | en_US |
pubs.embargo.period | Not known | en_US |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Public Health | |
utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | * |
pubs.publication-status | Published | en_US |
pubs.volume | 141 | en_US |
Abstract:
© 2018 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Objectives: To compare scores on the 36-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 tool (WHODAS-36) for postpartum women across a continuum of morbidity and to validate the 12-item version (WHODAS-12). Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Brazilian retrospective cohort study on long-term repercussions of severe maternal morbidity. We determined mean, median, and percentile values for WHODAS-36 total score and for each domain, and percentile values for WHODAS-12 total score in postpartum women divided into three groups: “no,” “nonsevere,” and “severe” morbidities. Results: The WHODAS-36 mean total scores were 11.58, 18.31, and 19.19, respectively for no, nonsevere, and severe morbidity. There was a dose-dependent effect on scores for each domain of WHODAS-36 according to the presence and severity of morbidity. The diagnostic validity of WHODAS-12 was determined by comparing it with WHODAS-36 as a “gold standard.” The best cut-off point for diagnosing dysfunctionality was the 95th percentile. Conclusion: The upward trend of WHODAS-36 total mean value scores of women with no morbidity compared with those with morbidity along a severity continuum may reflect the impact of morbidity on postpartum functioning.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph