Methodology
Teske, S
Pregger, T
Simon, S
Naegler, T
Pagenkopf, J
Van Den Adel, B
Meinshausen, M
Dooley, K
Briggs, C
Dominish, E
Giurco, D
Florin, N
Morris, T
Nagrath, K
Pregger, T
Simon, S
Naegler, T
Pagenkopf, J
Van Den Adel, B
Meinshausen, M
Dooley, K
Briggs, C
Dominish, E
Giurco, D
Florin, N
Morris, T
Nagrath, K
- Publication Type:
- Chapter
- Citation:
- Achieving the Paris Climate Agreement Goals: Global and Regional 100% Renewable Energy Scenarios with Non-Energy GHG Pathways for +1.5C and +2C, 2019, pp. 25 - 78
- Issue Date:
- 2019-01-01
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
© The Author(s) 2019. A detailed overview of the methodologies used to develop the 2.0 °C and 1.5 °C scenario presented in this book. Starting with the overall modelling approach, the interaction of seven different models is explained which are used to calculate and developed detailed scenarios for greenhouse gas emission and energy pathways to stay within a 2.0 °C and 1.5 °C global warming limit. The following models are presented: For the non-energy GHG emission pathways, the Generalized Equal Quantile Walk (GQW)method, the land-based sequestration design method and the Carbon cycle and climate (MAGICC) model. For the energy pathways, a renewable energy resources assessment for space constrained environments ([R]E-SPACE, the transport scenario model (TRAEM), the Energy System Model (EM) and the power system model [R]E 24/7. The methodologies of an employment analysis model, and a metal resource assessment tool are outlined. These models have been used to examine the analysis of the energy scenario results.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: