Crimmigration and Refugees: Bridging Visas, Criminal Cancellations and ‘Living in the Community’ as Punishment and Deterrence

Vogl, A

Crimmigration and Refugees: Bridging Visas, Criminal Cancellations and ‘Living in the Community’ as Punishment and Deterrence

Vogl, A

Permalink

Publisher:: Springer
Publication Type:: Chapter
Citation:: Crimmigration in Australia: Law, Politics, and Society, 2019, 1st edition, pp. 130 - 154
Issue Date:: 2019-10-04

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

The embargo period expires on 4 Oct 2021

Adobe PDF

Download Accepted Manuscript versionAdobe PDF (543.41 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Vogl, A https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6327-0524	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Billings, P	en_US
dc.date.issued	2019-10-04	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Crimmigration in Australia: Law, Politics, and Society, 2019, 1st edition, pp. 130 - 154	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9811390924	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9789811390920	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/134601
dc.description.abstract	Australia’s status as the only state with a policy of mandatory indefinite detention of all unlawful non-citizens, including asylum seekers, who are within Australian territory is a fact that is both well-known and frequently cited. From its inception, mandatory immigration detention was touted as ‘the method of deterrence for those seeking asylum onshore’ and since then ‘mandatory detention has been at the forefront of a deterrence as control and control as deterrence discourse’2. The imagined subjects of deterrence are frequently asylum seekers presented as ‘bogus’ or as economic migrants, and the sites for control are Australia’s ‘immigration program’ and borders. While these dual factors have animated the implementation and continuation of the policy for over 25 years, the contemporary practice and enforcement of detention in Australia presents a much more complex picture.	en_US
dc.publisher	Springer	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Crimmigration in Australia: Law, Politics, and Society	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/978-981-13-9093-7_7	en_US
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.title	Crimmigration and Refugees: Bridging Visas, Criminal Cancellations and ‘Living in the Community’ as Punishment and Deterrence	en_US
dc.type	Chapter
utslib.location	Germany	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
utslib.citation.edition	1st edition	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
utslib.copyright.embargo	2021-10-04T00:00:00+1100
pubs.edition	1st edition	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	Germany	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

Australia’s status as the only state with a policy of mandatory indefinite detention of all unlawful non-citizens, including asylum seekers, who are within Australian territory is a fact that is both well-known and frequently cited. From its inception, mandatory immigration detention was touted as ‘the method of deterrence for those seeking asylum onshore’ and since then ‘mandatory detention has been at the forefront of a deterrence as control and control as deterrence discourse’2. The imagined subjects of deterrence are frequently asylum seekers presented as ‘bogus’ or as economic migrants, and the sites for control are Australia’s ‘immigration program’ and borders. While these dual factors have animated the implementation and continuation of the policy for over 25 years, the contemporary practice and enforcement of detention in Australia presents a much more complex picture.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/134601