Field |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Burke, PF |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Eckert, C
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-6978
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sethi, S |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-09-30T20:23:41Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-09-30T20:23:41Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Journal of Marketing Research, 2020, 57, (1), pp. 35-54 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0022-2437 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1547-7193 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10453/142943
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:p> Previous research has demonstrated that consumers evaluate products according to their perceived benefits when making a choice. This article extends prior work by proposing a method that evaluates the degree to which multiple a priori defined benefits mediate product choices. The model is the first to consider process heterogeneity—that is, heterogeneity in how consumers perceive multiple attributes to positively or negatively affect multiple benefits simultaneously and the contribution of each benefit to product utility. The authors propose discrete choice experiments to holistically measure the link between attributes and benefits, as well as between attributes and choice, resulting in data that can be analyzed with a generalized probit model. The approach contributes to mediation research by offering an alternative method of handling multiple multinomial mediators and dichotomous outcome variables. An empirical illustration of bread choices shows how consumer judgments about health and value perceptions of products mediate purchase decisions. The authors demonstrate how the method can help managers (1) confirm and test existing knowledge about latent benefits, including whether they explain all the variation in choice, and (2) consider process heterogeneity to inform market segmentation strategies. </jats:p> |
|
dc.language |
en |
|
dc.publisher |
SAGE Publications |
|
dc.relation |
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE130101463
|
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Journal of Marketing Research |
|
dc.relation.isbasedon |
10.1177/0022243719881618 |
|
dc.rights |
Journal of Marketing Research, 2020, 57, (1), pp. 35-54. Copyright © 2020 SAGE Publications. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022243719881618 |
en_US |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
|
dc.subject |
1505 Marketing |
|
dc.subject.classification |
Marketing |
|
dc.title |
A Multiattribute Benefits-Based Choice Model with Multiple Mediators: New Insights for Positioning |
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
utslib.citation.volume |
57 |
|
utslib.for |
1505 Marketing |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - ACRI - Australia China Relations Institute |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - BIDA - Business Intelligence and Data Analytics |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business/Marketing Discipline |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney |
|
utslib.copyright.status |
open_access |
* |
pubs.consider-herdc |
true |
|
dc.date.updated |
2020-09-30T20:23:30Z |
|
pubs.issue |
1 |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
pubs.volume |
57 |
|
utslib.citation.issue |
1 |
|