Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management

Saffer, AJ; Yang, A; Taylor, M

Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management

Saffer, AJ Yang, A Taylor, M

Permalink

Publisher:: SAGE Publications
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Management Communication Quarterly, 2018, 32, (1), pp. 121-139
Issue Date:: 2018-02-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	0893318917700510.pdf	Published version	635.58 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Saffer, AJ
dc.contributor.author	Yang, A
dc.contributor.author	Taylor, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9420-3591
dc.date.accessioned	2022-08-29T19:44:47Z
dc.date.available	2022-08-29T19:44:47Z
dc.date.issued	2018-02-01
dc.identifier.citation	Management Communication Quarterly, 2018, 32, (1), pp. 121-139
dc.identifier.issn	0893-3189
dc.identifier.issn	1552-6798
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/161042
dc.description.abstract	© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. Multistakeholder issue networks have been characterized as power-free, egalitarian forms of corporate–civil society engagement. Using a communication-centered conceptualization of power, our study finds that potential sources of power subtly manifest through communication and interaction patterns in multistakeholder issue networks. Our results indicate that organizations’ institutional status and resources are significant predictors of network power.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	SAGE Publications
dc.relation.ispartof	Management Communication Quarterly
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1177/0893318917700510
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1005 Communications Technologies, 1503 Business and Management, 2001 Communication and Media Studies
dc.subject.classification	Business & Management
dc.title	Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	32
utslib.for	1005 Communications Technologies
utslib.for	1503 Business and Management
utslib.for	2001 Communication and Media Studies
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/Public Communication Program
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2022-08-29T19:44:46Z
pubs.issue	1
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	32
utslib.citation.issue	1

Abstract:

© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. Multistakeholder issue networks have been characterized as power-free, egalitarian forms of corporate–civil society engagement. Using a communication-centered conceptualization of power, our study finds that potential sources of power subtly manifest through communication and interaction patterns in multistakeholder issue networks. Our results indicate that organizations’ institutional status and resources are significant predictors of network power.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/161042