Two types of entrepreneurship process research revisited: Solidifying the evidence and moving forward

Davidsson, P; Gruenhagen, JH

Two types of entrepreneurship process research revisited: Solidifying the evidence and moving forward

Davidsson, P Gruenhagen, JH

Permalink

Publisher:: Elsevier BV
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 2022, 18, pp. e00326
Issue Date:: 2022-11-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Process 2 last author version.pdf	Accepted version	486.65 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Davidsson, P
dc.contributor.author	Gruenhagen, JH
dc.date.accessioned	2023-01-12T22:47:37Z
dc.date.available	2023-01-12T22:47:37Z
dc.date.issued	2022-11-01
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 2022, 18, pp. e00326
dc.identifier.issn	2352-6734
dc.identifier.issn	2352-6734
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/164922
dc.description.abstract	In their review of venture creation process research, Davidsson and Gruenhagen (2021) identified two distinct types of process research: process as a journey through qualitative changes in content and process as a directional and temporal journey toward a goal. We revisit their findings with more robust methodology and find that these two are indeed distinct, ideal types that capture two centers of gravity in process-oriented research on venture creation. We enrich the picture of these two types of process research and develop ideas for how future research can address their respective weaknesses.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Business Venturing Insights
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00326
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1503 Business and Management
dc.title	Two types of entrepreneurship process research revisited: Solidifying the evidence and moving forward
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	18
utslib.for	1503 Business and Management
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost/TD School
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2023-01-12T22:47:36Z
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	18

Abstract:

In their review of venture creation process research, Davidsson and Gruenhagen (2021) identified two distinct types of process research: process as a journey through qualitative changes in content and process as a directional and temporal journey toward a goal. We revisit their findings with more robust methodology and find that these two are indeed distinct, ideal types that capture two centers of gravity in process-oriented research on venture creation. We enrich the picture of these two types of process research and develop ideas for how future research can address their respective weaknesses.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/164922