Acceptability of a virtual prostate cancer survivorship care model in rural Australia: A multi-methods, single-centre feasibility pilot.
Heneka, N
Chambers, SK
Schaefer, I
Carmont, K
Parcell, M
Wallis, S
Walker, S
Tuffaha, H
Steele, M
Dunn, J
- Publisher:
- WILEY
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Aust J Rural Health, 2024, 32, (4), pp. 815-826
- Issue Date:
- 2024-08
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author |
Heneka, N |
|
dc.contributor.author | Chambers, SK | |
dc.contributor.author |
Schaefer, I |
|
dc.contributor.author | Carmont, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Parcell, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Wallis, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Walker, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Tuffaha, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Steele, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Dunn, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-23T04:23:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-26 | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-23T04:23:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aust J Rural Health, 2024, 32, (4), pp. 815-826 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1038-5282 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1440-1584 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/180919 | |
dc.description.abstract | DESIGN: A multi-methods, single-centre pilot comprising a quasi-experimental pre-/post-test design and an exploratory qualitative study. SETTING: A rural Australian hospital and health service. PARTICIPANTS: Men newly diagnosed with localised prostate cancer who were scheduled to undergo, or had undergone, radical or robotic prostatectomy surgery within the previous 3 months. INTERVENTION: The intervention comprised a 12-week virtual care program delivered via teleconference by a specialist nurse, using a pre-existing connected care platform. The program was tailored to the post-operative recovery journey targeting post-operative care, psychoeducation, problem-solving and goal setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: program acceptability. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: quality of life; prostate cancer-related distress; insomnia severity; fatigue severity; measured at baseline (T1); immediately post-intervention (T2); and 12 weeks post-intervention (T3). RESULTS: Seventeen participants completed the program. The program intervention showed very high levels (≥4/5) of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. At T1, 47% (n = 8) of men reported clinically significant psychological distress, which had significantly decreased by T3 (p = 0.020). There was a significant improvement in urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (p = 0.030) and a corresponding decrease in urinary function burden (p = 0.005) from T1 to T3. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot has shown that a tailored nurse-led virtual care program, incorporating post-surgical follow-up and integrated low-intensity psychosocial care, is both acceptable to rural participants and feasible in terms of implementation and impact on patient outcomes. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | WILEY | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Aust J Rural Health | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1111/ajr.13149 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 16 Studies in Human Society | |
dc.subject.classification | 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | 42 Health sciences | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prostatic Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pilot Projects | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feasibility Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Telemedicine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Quality of Life | |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Acceptance of Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Rural Population | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survivorship | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cancer Survivors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prostatic Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feasibility Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pilot Projects | |
dc.subject.mesh | Telemedicine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Quality of Life | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Rural Population | |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Acceptance of Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cancer Survivors | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survivorship | |
dc.title | Acceptability of a virtual prostate cancer survivorship care model in rural Australia: A multi-methods, single-centre feasibility pilot. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 32 | |
utslib.location.activity | Australia | |
utslib.for | 11 Medical and Health Sciences | |
utslib.for | 16 Studies in Human Society | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Research Centres/IMPACCT | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health/Research Centres | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.rights.license | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-09-23T04:23:06Z | |
pubs.issue | 4 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 32 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 4 |
Abstract:
DESIGN: A multi-methods, single-centre pilot comprising a quasi-experimental pre-/post-test design and an exploratory qualitative study. SETTING: A rural Australian hospital and health service. PARTICIPANTS: Men newly diagnosed with localised prostate cancer who were scheduled to undergo, or had undergone, radical or robotic prostatectomy surgery within the previous 3 months. INTERVENTION: The intervention comprised a 12-week virtual care program delivered via teleconference by a specialist nurse, using a pre-existing connected care platform. The program was tailored to the post-operative recovery journey targeting post-operative care, psychoeducation, problem-solving and goal setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: program acceptability. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: quality of life; prostate cancer-related distress; insomnia severity; fatigue severity; measured at baseline (T1); immediately post-intervention (T2); and 12 weeks post-intervention (T3). RESULTS: Seventeen participants completed the program. The program intervention showed very high levels (≥4/5) of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. At T1, 47% (n = 8) of men reported clinically significant psychological distress, which had significantly decreased by T3 (p = 0.020). There was a significant improvement in urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (p = 0.030) and a corresponding decrease in urinary function burden (p = 0.005) from T1 to T3. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot has shown that a tailored nurse-led virtual care program, incorporating post-surgical follow-up and integrated low-intensity psychosocial care, is both acceptable to rural participants and feasible in terms of implementation and impact on patient outcomes.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph