An investigation of the role of parental request for self-correction of stuttering in the Lidcombe Program
- Publisher:
- TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2015, 17, (5), pp. 511-517
- Issue Date:
- 2015-01-01
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
An investigation of the role of parental request for self-correction of stuttering in the Lidcombe Program.pdf | Published version | 430.91 kB | Adobe PDF |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Donaghy, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Harrison, E | |
dc.contributor.author |
O'Brian, S |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Menzies, R |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Onslow, M |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Packman, A |
|
dc.contributor.author | Jones, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-30T11:48:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-30T11:48:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2015, 17, (5), pp. 511-517 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1754-9515 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1754-9507 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/184686 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2015 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited. Purpose: The Lidcombe Program is a behavioural treatment for stuttering in children younger than 6 years that is supported by evidence of efficacy and effectiveness. The treatment incorporates parent verbal contingencies for stutter-free speech and for stuttering. However, the contribution of those contingencies to reductions in stuttering in the program is unclear.Method: Thirty-four parent-child dyads were randomized to two treatment groups. The control group received standard Lidcombe Program and the experimental group received Lidcombe Program without instruction to parents to use the verbal contingency request for self-correction. Treatment responsiveness was measured as time to 50% stuttering severity reduction.Result: No differences were found between groups on primary outcome measures of the number of weeks and clinic visits to 50% reduction in stuttering severity.Conclusion: This clinical experiment challenges the assumption that the verbal contingency request for self-correction contributes to treatment efficacy. Results suggest the need for further research to explore this issue. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | |
dc.relation | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/633007 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.3109/17549507.2015.1016110 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1702 Cognitive Sciences, 2004 Linguistics | |
dc.subject.classification | Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology | |
dc.subject.classification | 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science | |
dc.subject.classification | 4704 Linguistics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child, Preschool | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Parents | |
dc.subject.mesh | Speech Therapy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Stuttering | |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Stuttering | |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject.mesh | Speech Therapy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Parents | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child, Preschool | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Child, Preschool | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Parents | |
dc.subject.mesh | Speech Therapy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Stuttering | |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.title | An investigation of the role of parental request for self-correction of stuttering in the Lidcombe Program | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 17 | |
utslib.location.activity | England | |
utslib.for | 1103 Clinical Sciences | |
utslib.for | 1702 Cognitive Sciences | |
utslib.for | 2004 Linguistics | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Australian Stuttering Research Centre (ASRC) | |
utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | * |
pubs.consider-herdc | false | |
dc.date.updated | 2025-01-30T11:48:21Z | |
pubs.issue | 5 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 17 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 5 |
Abstract:
© 2015 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited. Purpose: The Lidcombe Program is a behavioural treatment for stuttering in children younger than 6 years that is supported by evidence of efficacy and effectiveness. The treatment incorporates parent verbal contingencies for stutter-free speech and for stuttering. However, the contribution of those contingencies to reductions in stuttering in the program is unclear.Method: Thirty-four parent-child dyads were randomized to two treatment groups. The control group received standard Lidcombe Program and the experimental group received Lidcombe Program without instruction to parents to use the verbal contingency request for self-correction. Treatment responsiveness was measured as time to 50% stuttering severity reduction.Result: No differences were found between groups on primary outcome measures of the number of weeks and clinic visits to 50% reduction in stuttering severity.Conclusion: This clinical experiment challenges the assumption that the verbal contingency request for self-correction contributes to treatment efficacy. Results suggest the need for further research to explore this issue.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph