Sustainability starts with spending: public financial management lessons from Kenya's universal health care pilot.
- Publisher:
- BMC
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- BMC Health Serv Res, 2025, 25, (1), pp. 1029
- Issue Date:
- 2025-08-05
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Adjagba, AO | |
dc.contributor.author | Oguta, JO | |
dc.contributor.author | Akoth, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Toweet, SK | |
dc.contributor.author | Okoth, P | |
dc.contributor.author |
Jackson, D |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-03T07:47:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-10 | |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-03T07:47:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-08-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Health Serv Res, 2025, 25, (1), pp. 1029 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/189591 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Effective public financial management (PFM) is a foundational enabler of sustainable progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Achieving UHC requires not only increased funding for the health sector but also the efficient, equitable, and accountable use of resources. In 2019, Kenya piloted a UHC initiative across four counties to generate evidence to inform national scale-up. This study examines the PFM processes underpinning the pilot implementation, with a focus on how financial planning, budget execution, and accountability mechanisms influenced the delivery of UHC interventions at the county level. METHODS: This study employed a qualitative research design to explore PFM processes during the implementation of Kenya's UHC pilot in four counties. Data were collected through 51 in-depth interviews and five focus group discussions with key stakeholders, including healthcare workers, patient representatives, and senior members of the County Health Management Teams (CHMTs). An inductive thematic analysis approach was employed to identify patterns and themes that emerged from the data. The analysis was facilitated using Dedoose software (Version 9.0.17), which enabled systematic coding and organization of the qualitative data. RESULTS: The UHC pilot program in Kenya featured a hybrid planning model, combining top-down directives from the national government with bottom-up inputs from county stakeholders. Despite this collaborative approach, county budgeting processes remained governed by the stipulations of the PFM Act. While counties welcomed additional UHC funds, the removal of user fees led to reduced facility-level revenue, increased service demand, and strain on human and material resources. Delays in fund disbursement, rigid budget structures, and limited financial autonomy further constrained implementation. These experiences underscore the need for a more coherent integration of PFM and health financing policies at the subnational level to ensure sustainable and equitable health service delivery. CONCLUSION: The UHC pilot offers critical lessons for future health financing reforms. Addressing PFM bottlenecks-particularly those related to timely disbursement, budget flexibility, and local revenue generation-is essential to ensure the sustainability of UHC in Kenya and similar contexts. The study's limitations necessitate further research before scaling up nationwide. | |
dc.format | Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | BMC | |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Health Serv Res | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1186/s12913-025-13194-7 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | 0807 Library and Information Studies, 1110 Nursing, 1117 Public Health and Health Services | |
dc.subject.classification | Health Policy & Services | |
dc.subject.classification | 4203 Health services and systems | |
dc.subject.classification | 4205 Nursing | |
dc.subject.classification | 4206 Public health | |
dc.subject.mesh | Kenya | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pilot Projects | |
dc.subject.mesh | Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Focus Groups | |
dc.subject.mesh | Universal Health Insurance | |
dc.subject.mesh | Financial Management | |
dc.subject.mesh | Universal Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Interviews as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Expenditures | |
dc.subject.mesh | Budgets | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Focus Groups | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pilot Projects | |
dc.subject.mesh | Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Expenditures | |
dc.subject.mesh | Financial Management | |
dc.subject.mesh | Budgets | |
dc.subject.mesh | Kenya | |
dc.subject.mesh | Interviews as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Universal Health Insurance | |
dc.subject.mesh | Universal Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Kenya | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pilot Projects | |
dc.subject.mesh | Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Focus Groups | |
dc.subject.mesh | Universal Health Insurance | |
dc.subject.mesh | Financial Management | |
dc.subject.mesh | Universal Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Interviews as Topic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Expenditures | |
dc.subject.mesh | Budgets | |
dc.title | Sustainability starts with spending: public financial management lessons from Kenya's universal health care pilot. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 25 | |
utslib.location.activity | England | |
utslib.for | 0807 Library and Information Studies | |
utslib.for | 1110 Nursing | |
utslib.for | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.rights.license | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.date.updated | 2025-09-03T07:47:11Z | |
pubs.issue | 1 | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | |
pubs.volume | 25 | |
utslib.citation.issue | 1 |
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Effective public financial management (PFM) is a foundational enabler of sustainable progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Achieving UHC requires not only increased funding for the health sector but also the efficient, equitable, and accountable use of resources. In 2019, Kenya piloted a UHC initiative across four counties to generate evidence to inform national scale-up. This study examines the PFM processes underpinning the pilot implementation, with a focus on how financial planning, budget execution, and accountability mechanisms influenced the delivery of UHC interventions at the county level. METHODS: This study employed a qualitative research design to explore PFM processes during the implementation of Kenya's UHC pilot in four counties. Data were collected through 51 in-depth interviews and five focus group discussions with key stakeholders, including healthcare workers, patient representatives, and senior members of the County Health Management Teams (CHMTs). An inductive thematic analysis approach was employed to identify patterns and themes that emerged from the data. The analysis was facilitated using Dedoose software (Version 9.0.17), which enabled systematic coding and organization of the qualitative data. RESULTS: The UHC pilot program in Kenya featured a hybrid planning model, combining top-down directives from the national government with bottom-up inputs from county stakeholders. Despite this collaborative approach, county budgeting processes remained governed by the stipulations of the PFM Act. While counties welcomed additional UHC funds, the removal of user fees led to reduced facility-level revenue, increased service demand, and strain on human and material resources. Delays in fund disbursement, rigid budget structures, and limited financial autonomy further constrained implementation. These experiences underscore the need for a more coherent integration of PFM and health financing policies at the subnational level to ensure sustainable and equitable health service delivery. CONCLUSION: The UHC pilot offers critical lessons for future health financing reforms. Addressing PFM bottlenecks-particularly those related to timely disbursement, budget flexibility, and local revenue generation-is essential to ensure the sustainability of UHC in Kenya and similar contexts. The study's limitations necessitate further research before scaling up nationwide.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph