Group versus conventional antenatal care for women (Review)
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012, (11), pp. 1 - 59
- Issue Date:
- 2012-05-16
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 2012004482OK.pdf | 524.43 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
The primary and secondary outcomes were pre-determined as described. The included trials measured a number of outcomes that were non-pre-speci?ed. As these were important for the populations studied in the trials, these were included post hoc. For example, the Ickovics 2007a trial targeted young women and the outcomes included sexual and behavioural outcomes including HIV risk behaviour and STDs. The Kennedy 2011 trial included family healthcare readiness. In addition, inadequate antenatal care was included as a non-pre-speci?ed outcome as it was used as a measure of quality of care
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: