Comparing PLM and BIM from the product structure standpoint

Boton, C; Rivest, L; Forgues, D; Jupp, J

Comparing PLM and BIM from the product structure standpoint

Boton, C Rivest, L Forgues, D Jupp, J

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2016, 492 pp. 443 - 453
Issue Date:: 2016-01-01

Recently Added

	Filename	Description	Size
	2016_BotonEtAl_ComparingPLMandBIMwithPS_ICPLM.pdf	Accepted Manuscript version	501.41 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is new to OPUS and is not currently available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Boton, C	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Rivest, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Forgues, D	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Jupp, J https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3774-261X	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2016, 492 pp. 443 - 453	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9783319546599	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1868-4238	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/75871
dc.description.abstract	© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016. The increasing use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) across the construction industry highlights the potential for a common endpoint with manufacturing industries. Previous research work has shown that it is possible to improve BIM with the features and the best practices from Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) approach. This article provides a comparison between the PLM and BIM approaches from the standpoint of the Product Structure (PS) and the Bill of Material (BOM). It discusses the need to explicit a structuring concept in the BIM approach in order be able to switch to an information-centric management approach in construction projects instead of the current activity-based approach.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/978-3-319-54660-5_40	en_US
dc.title	Comparing PLM and BIM from the product structure standpoint	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	492	en_US
utslib.for	1202 Building	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Professional Practice and Leadership
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCDP - Contemporary Design Practice
utslib.copyright.status	recently_added
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	492	en_US

Abstract:

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016. The increasing use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) across the construction industry highlights the potential for a common endpoint with manufacturing industries. Previous research work has shown that it is possible to improve BIM with the features and the best practices from Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) approach. This article provides a comparison between the PLM and BIM approaches from the standpoint of the Product Structure (PS) and the Bill of Material (BOM). It discusses the need to explicit a structuring concept in the BIM approach in order be able to switch to an information-centric management approach in construction projects instead of the current activity-based approach.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/75871