Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic: the shifting balance of shareholders' interests in insolvency-evolution or revolution?
- Publisher:
- Melbourne University Law Review Association
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Hargovan Anil and Harris Jason 2007, 'Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic: the shifting balance of shareholders' interests in insolvency-evolution or revolution?', Melbourne University Law Review Association, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 591-621.
- Issue Date:
- 2007
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
In Sons of Gwalia, the High Court of Australia found that shareholders who had been allegedly
induced into purchasing shares in a company shortly prior to its insolvency by misrepresentations
and inadequate market disclosure were able to lodge claims as creditors in the company’s voluntary
administration. The High Court interpreted the statutory subordination provisions in the Corporations
Act 2001 (Cth) narrowly, with the result that many shareholders will be permitted to stand
alongside non-shareholder creditors (as contingent creditors) in corporate insolvencies. Whilst this
has the effect of diluting the returns to unsecured creditors, it also reinforces the importance of
corporate disclosure and other consumer protection laws by providing misled shareholders with a
remedy during the company’s insolvency. This case note discusses the High Court’s decision and
comments on where the ruling fits into the broader corporate insolvency landscape. The case note
then looks to the future to comment on where the law of shareholder subordination may be headed.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: