On the logical properties of Keynes's theorising, and different approaches to the Keynes-institutionalism nexus

O'Donnell, R

On the logical properties of Keynes's theorising, and different approaches to the Keynes-institutionalism nexus

O'Donnell, R

Permalink

Publisher:: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Institutional Economics, 2019, 15, (4), pp. 741-747
Issue Date:: 2019-08-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	on_the_logical_properties_of_keyness_theorising_and_different_approaches_to_the_keynesinstitutionalism_nexus.pdf	Published version	123.35 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	O'Donnell, R
dc.date.accessioned	2020-06-05T21:22:47Z
dc.date.available	2020-06-05T21:22:47Z
dc.date.issued	2019-08-01
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Institutional Economics, 2019, 15, (4), pp. 741-747
dc.identifier.issn	1744-1374
dc.identifier.issn	1744-1382
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/141151
dc.description.abstract	Copyright © 2019 Millennium Economics Ltd. This paper replies to Hodgson (2019), which responds to my analysis and critique in O'Donnell (2018). My present aim is clarification of our respective positions, our agreements and disagreements, and their underlying causes. To this end, I elaborate further on the logic underpinning my initial paper, comment on several (not all) key points in Hodgson's response, and conclude with the matter of our different agendas. Space limitations preclude fuller discussion and encourage concise expression.
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Cambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Institutional Economics
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1017/S1744137419000079
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1402 Applied Economics
dc.title	On the logical properties of Keynes's theorising, and different approaches to the Keynes-institutionalism nexus
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	15
utslib.for	1402 Applied Economics
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business/Management Discipline
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2020-06-05T21:22:44Z
pubs.issue	4
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	15
utslib.start-page	741
utslib.citation.issue	4

Abstract:

Copyright © 2019 Millennium Economics Ltd. This paper replies to Hodgson (2019), which responds to my analysis and critique in O'Donnell (2018). My present aim is clarification of our respective positions, our agreements and disagreements, and their underlying causes. To this end, I elaborate further on the logic underpinning my initial paper, comment on several (not all) key points in Hodgson's response, and conclude with the matter of our different agendas. Space limitations preclude fuller discussion and encourage concise expression.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/141151