Controversies as method for ANTi-history [CONTROVÉRSIAS COMO MÉTODO PARA ANTI-HISTÓRIA]

Tureta, C; AméRico, B; Clegg, S

Controversies as method for ANTi-history [CONTROVÉRSIAS COMO MÉTODO PARA ANTI-HISTÓRIA]

Tureta, C AméRico, B Clegg, S

Permalink

Publisher:: Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Revista de Administracao de Empresas (RAE), 2021, 61, (1), pp. 1-12
Issue Date:: 2021-01-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (359.11 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Tureta, C
dc.contributor.author	AméRico, B
dc.contributor.author	Clegg, S https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-4283
dc.date.accessioned	2021-12-12T20:44:05Z
dc.date.available	2021-12-12T20:44:05Z
dc.date.issued	2021-01-01
dc.identifier.citation	Revista de Administracao de Empresas (RAE), 2021, 61, (1), pp. 1-12
dc.identifier.issn	0034-7590
dc.identifier.issn	2178-938X
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/152249
dc.description.abstract	Our aim is to develop and propose a method for ANTi-historians, using analysis of controversy as the starting point. Despite the theoretical and methodological development of the ANTi-history approach to the study of knowledge of the past and the creation of its history, there is room for method development based on controversy analysis. We ground our proposal in some of ANTi-history’s assumptions (relationalism, the symmetry principle, and multiplicity) and practical concepts (translation and politics of actor-networks). In addition, we recommend four criteria that researchers should use in choosing a controversy to serve as a starting point for investigation. Finally, we present five steps for investigating knowledge of the past and the creation of history.
dc.language	English
dc.publisher	Fundação Getúlio Vargas
dc.relation.ispartof	Revista de Administracao de Empresas (RAE)
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1590/S0034-759020210105
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject	1503 Business and Management
dc.title	Controversies as method for ANTi-history [CONTROVÉRSIAS COMO MÉTODO PARA ANTI-HISTÓRIA]
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	61
utslib.for	1503 Business and Management
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business/Management Discipline
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
pubs.consider-herdc	false
dc.date.updated	2021-12-12T20:44:04Z
pubs.issue	1
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	61
utslib.citation.issue	1

Abstract:

Our aim is to develop and propose a method for ANTi-historians, using analysis of controversy as the starting point. Despite the theoretical and methodological development of the ANTi-history approach to the study of knowledge of the past and the creation of its history, there is room for method development based on controversy analysis. We ground our proposal in some of ANTi-history’s assumptions (relationalism, the symmetry principle, and multiplicity) and practical concepts (translation and politics of actor-networks). In addition, we recommend four criteria that researchers should use in choosing a controversy to serve as a starting point for investigation. Finally, we present five steps for investigating knowledge of the past and the creation of history.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/152249