Comprehensive review of deep learning in orthopaedics: Applications, challenges, trustworthiness, and fusion.
Alzubaidi, L
Al-Dulaimi, K
Salhi, A
Alammar, Z
Fadhel, MA
Albahri, AS
Alamoodi, AH
Albahri, OS
Hasan, AF
Bai, J
Gilliland, L
Peng, J
Branni, M
Shuker, T
Cutbush, K
Santamaría, J
Moreira, C
Ouyang, C
Duan, Y
Manoufali, M
Jomaa, M
Gupta, A
Abbosh, A
Gu, Y
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Artif Intell Med, 2024, 155, pp. 102935
- Issue Date:
- 2024-09
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.contributor.author | Alzubaidi, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Dulaimi, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Salhi, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Alammar, Z | |
dc.contributor.author | Fadhel, MA | |
dc.contributor.author | Albahri, AS | |
dc.contributor.author | Alamoodi, AH | |
dc.contributor.author | Albahri, OS | |
dc.contributor.author | Hasan, AF | |
dc.contributor.author | Bai, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Gilliland, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Peng, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Branni, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Shuker, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Cutbush, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Santamaría, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Moreira, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Ouyang, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Duan, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Manoufali, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Jomaa, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Gupta, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Abbosh, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Gu, Y | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T00:10:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-22 | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T00:10:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Artif Intell Med, 2024, 155, pp. 102935 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0933-3657 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-2860 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/185011 | |
dc.description.abstract | Deep learning (DL) in orthopaedics has gained significant attention in recent years. Previous studies have shown that DL can be applied to a wide variety of orthopaedic tasks, including fracture detection, bone tumour diagnosis, implant recognition, and evaluation of osteoarthritis severity. The utilisation of DL is expected to increase, owing to its ability to present accurate diagnoses more efficiently than traditional methods in many scenarios. This reduces the time and cost of diagnosis for patients and orthopaedic surgeons. To our knowledge, no exclusive study has comprehensively reviewed all aspects of DL currently used in orthopaedic practice. This review addresses this knowledge gap using articles from Science Direct, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science between 2017 and 2023. The authors begin with the motivation for using DL in orthopaedics, including its ability to enhance diagnosis and treatment planning. The review then covers various applications of DL in orthopaedics, including fracture detection, detection of supraspinatus tears using MRI, osteoarthritis, prediction of types of arthroplasty implants, bone age assessment, and detection of joint-specific soft tissue disease. We also examine the challenges for implementing DL in orthopaedics, including the scarcity of data to train DL and the lack of interpretability, as well as possible solutions to these common pitfalls. Our work highlights the requirements to achieve trustworthiness in the outcomes generated by DL, including the need for accuracy, explainability, and fairness in the DL models. We pay particular attention to fusion techniques as one of the ways to increase trustworthiness, which have also been used to address the common multimodality in orthopaedics. Finally, we have reviewed the approval requirements set forth by the US Food and Drug Administration to enable the use of DL applications. As such, we aim to have this review function as a guide for researchers to develop a reliable DL application for orthopaedic tasks from scratch for use in the market. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Artif Intell Med | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102935 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.subject | 08 Information and Computing Sciences, 09 Engineering | |
dc.subject.classification | Medical Informatics | |
dc.subject.classification | 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | 42 Health sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | 46 Information and computing sciences | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Deep Learning | |
dc.subject.mesh | Orthopedics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Orthopedics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Deep Learning | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Deep Learning | |
dc.subject.mesh | Orthopedics | |
dc.title | Comprehensive review of deep learning in orthopaedics: Applications, challenges, trustworthiness, and fusion. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 155 | |
utslib.location.activity | Netherlands | |
utslib.for | 08 Information and Computing Sciences | |
utslib.for | 09 Engineering | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Data Science Institute (DSI) | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/The Trustworthy Digital Society | |
utslib.copyright.status | open_access | * |
dc.date.updated | 2025-02-07T00:10:07Z | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 155 |
Abstract:
Deep learning (DL) in orthopaedics has gained significant attention in recent years. Previous studies have shown that DL can be applied to a wide variety of orthopaedic tasks, including fracture detection, bone tumour diagnosis, implant recognition, and evaluation of osteoarthritis severity. The utilisation of DL is expected to increase, owing to its ability to present accurate diagnoses more efficiently than traditional methods in many scenarios. This reduces the time and cost of diagnosis for patients and orthopaedic surgeons. To our knowledge, no exclusive study has comprehensively reviewed all aspects of DL currently used in orthopaedic practice. This review addresses this knowledge gap using articles from Science Direct, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science between 2017 and 2023. The authors begin with the motivation for using DL in orthopaedics, including its ability to enhance diagnosis and treatment planning. The review then covers various applications of DL in orthopaedics, including fracture detection, detection of supraspinatus tears using MRI, osteoarthritis, prediction of types of arthroplasty implants, bone age assessment, and detection of joint-specific soft tissue disease. We also examine the challenges for implementing DL in orthopaedics, including the scarcity of data to train DL and the lack of interpretability, as well as possible solutions to these common pitfalls. Our work highlights the requirements to achieve trustworthiness in the outcomes generated by DL, including the need for accuracy, explainability, and fairness in the DL models. We pay particular attention to fusion techniques as one of the ways to increase trustworthiness, which have also been used to address the common multimodality in orthopaedics. Finally, we have reviewed the approval requirements set forth by the US Food and Drug Administration to enable the use of DL applications. As such, we aim to have this review function as a guide for researchers to develop a reliable DL application for orthopaedic tasks from scratch for use in the market.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph