| Field |
Value |
Language |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Vu, TH |
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Yang, Y |
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dang, LC |
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sirivivatnanon, V
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1901-6064
|
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2025-04-14T03:40:07Z |
|
|
dc.date.available |
2025-04-14T03:40:07Z |
|
|
dc.date.issued |
2025-04-01 |
|
|
dc.identifier.citation |
MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2025, 77, (7-8) |
|
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0024-9831 |
|
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1751-763X |
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10453/186895
|
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:p> A comparative analysis of the chloride and acid resistance of one-part geopolymer and low carbon dioxide concretes is presented, with a focus on their potential to replace traditional systems based on ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in construction. The performance of geopolymer concretes (GPCs) was compared with concretes made with OPC and OPC blended with supplementary cementitious materials (fly ash and slag) under aggressive environmental conditions. The findings revealed that, while GPCs exhibit superior resistance to acid attack, their chloride resistance is highly dependent on the specific precursor materials used. The study also highlights the limitations of using rapid chloride permeability tests at standard voltages for GPCs, suggesting that lower voltage tests at 30 V may offer a more accurate assessment. Overall, the results underscore the need for optimised precursor selection in GPCs to enhance durability and advocate for further research into testing methodologies tailored to these innovative materials. </jats:p> |
|
|
dc.language |
English |
|
|
dc.publisher |
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD |
|
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH |
|
|
dc.relation.isbasedon |
10.1680/jmacr.24.00355 |
|
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
|
|
dc.rights |
Copyright ©2025, Emerald Publishing Limited. This AAM is provided for your own personal use only. It may not be used for resale, reprinting, systematic distribution, emailing, or for any other commercial purpose without the permission of the publisher |
|
|
dc.subject |
0905 Civil Engineering, 1202 Building |
|
|
dc.subject.classification |
Building & Construction |
|
|
dc.subject.classification |
3302 Building |
|
|
dc.subject.classification |
4005 Civil engineering |
|
|
dc.title |
Comparative analysis of chloride and acid resistance in one-part geopolymer and low-carbon concrete |
|
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
|
utslib.citation.volume |
77 |
|
|
utslib.for |
0905 Civil Engineering |
|
|
utslib.for |
1202 Building |
|
|
pubs.organisational-group |
University of Technology Sydney |
|
|
pubs.organisational-group |
University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology |
|
|
pubs.organisational-group |
University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Civil and Environmental Engineering |
|
|
pubs.organisational-group |
University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups |
|
|
pubs.organisational-group |
University of Technology Sydney/UTS Groups/Centre for Built Infrastructure Resilience (CBIR) |
|
|
utslib.copyright.status |
open_access |
* |
|
dc.date.updated |
2025-04-14T03:40:06Z |
|
|
pubs.issue |
7-8 |
|
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published online |
|
|
pubs.volume |
77 |
|
|
utslib.citation.issue |
7-8 |
|
